Comment

Feb 11, 2018
I would not believe everything this book says. Does it make use of English and American archives too, to try tell the "truth?" If you want to have a complete picture of how Lenin's commi revolution came by, read the following books as well: Anthony Sutton - Wall Street And The Bolshevik Revolution" and Ted Flynn - "Hope Of The Wicked." Lenin went from London thru Switzerland and Germany to Russia in a sealed train. OK, who were there with him in that train? (200 British Agents). Who taught Lenin what to do in Russia? English bankers. Who financed Lenin's revolution? Wall street bankers, including Averill Harriman, who later on was sent to Stalin's Russia as Ambassador of the USA. Who guarded the Trans-Siberian railway in 1919 against Japanese attacks? American soldiers (see Anthony Sutton's book). Communism was not the invention of Lenin. First there was the Paris Commune in 1789-1793, then English bankers hired Karl Marx in 1840 to write down the communist/anti-capitalist theory, and then came Lenin in 1905 and 1917. The West was very much involved in creating Communism in Russia, whereas they were allies of Russia in WW1. And who financed the Japanese to attack Russia in the Far East? The Americans (read Ted Flynn's book). One thing this book here tells is true: history is a tangle of plots, and the public never knows what is really happening, and what is its purpose. So, read those book of Sutton and Ted Flynn and create an approximate picture in your logical mind. By the way, if the Germans wanted to screw up Russia (their enemy), thereby getting rid of the Eastern Front successfully, then they should have won WW1. But instead, their Emperor held up his hands and said: "we lost." So, why did the West helped create Communism, to help their "enemies" (Germany) by screwing up Russia (their ally)? Well, there is the "rub," the hidden purpose for the longer run (divide and conquer, and rearrange the world).